GenChemUSA: 317.513.4721, PO BPX 15971 Fernandina Beach, FL 32035

 

  ARTICLE  

Reduction in Generation
of Laundry Sludge

By Stuart Davis and Robert Davis

In today's wastewater arena a major contributor to the local publicly owned treatment work (POTW) can be an industrial laundry. These facilities can be responsible for discharging up to 250,000 gallons per day to the sewer. The waste itself is the result of washing hundreds of thousands of pounds of uniforms, shop towels and food service items such as bar mops, aprons, and butcher coats. The waste influence can have a direct and major impact on the local POTW depending on the size of the receiving treatment plant. These factors can lead to local and state regulation of the industry through ordinances that demand compliance.

When commercial laundries are required by local authorities to clean their wastewater before discharging it into the sewer, the traditional method has been to clarify the water with the use of Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF), Induced Air Floatation (IAF) or Settling Clarifiers coupled with a chemistry program consisting of some combination of organic and inorganic components.

Typically, the wastewater generated through the laundering process is moved from the washing machines to a holding area (pit or tank), it is then screened for debris and lint and moved to another holding area to be equalized before being treated to remove the contaminated components. Prior to the clarifying system, the contaminated particles are agglomerated from a micro emulsion using a process of coagulation and then flocculation
where the particulates are made into ever increasing larger particles and finally into sludge. The clarification process utilizes a DAF, IAF, or settler to separate the waste containing sludge from the compliant effluent. The effluent is then discharged to the
local sewer authority for further processing, or reused within the laundry for the breakwater in a variety of wash cycles.

Traditionally in the world of commercial laundries, wastewater has been chemically treated to alter the micro-emulsion bond between the water and soil by the use of high sludge producing organic and inorganic chemicals. Especially high in sludge production
are those treatment programs reliant on bentonite clay, ferric salts, and or aluminum salts as the main driver in the emulsion breaking reaction. Even further adding to the weight
and volume of the sludge is the addition of "body feeds" such as perlite, diatomaceous earth and others including additional organic flocculants. Each additive increases the amount of sludge being generated by a portion of its volume, and through its chemical
hydration (bonding with water).

Most chemical treatment programs rely on from three to six separate steps of injecting or adding chemicals (organic and inorganic) to treat the influent for compliance, and or, for the ability of the sludge to be dewatered in a press or rotary vacuum filter. The addition of these additives to the waste stream results in more sludge generated and increases the amount of solids thereby decreasing overall efficiency of the treatment unit. From a cost standpoint; the addition "extra" chemicals represents a potential for the cost of the treatment of the water to rise. The sludge that is being generated at the treatment unit must ultimately be disposed of in a landfill in so doing creating a greater burden on landfill space.

The cost of wastewater treatment and sludge disposal negatively impacts the profitability of an industrial laundry in areas such as labor, sludge disposal, and chemical costs. In some cases the bottom line detractor can undermine the profitability of the individual business to the point of viability.

In response, GenChemUSA began to research ways to reduce the amount of sludge being generated, maintain effluent compliance, and to lower the cost of the chemical process. With the assistance of a large commercial laundry, a 2-part chemical treatment program was put into place that met these goals. The program consisted of a primary cationic (positive) coagulant and dry anionic (negative) flocculent. No pH adjustment was required to lower the alkaline nature of the wastewater. This eliminates the use of acid as a pH reducer as a step in the wastewater treatment process, unless required by local ordinace. A patent was applied for and granted to Stuart Davis and Robert Davis for this
innovative technology (US Patent# 7,160,470). This process has been licensed to GenChemUSA, a leader in wastewater technology specializing in industrial laundries.

The achievement of effluent clarity and compliance was not the most daunting task attempted by this program. One of the most difficult parts of the program was being able to dewater the sludge for cake formation in the press. This required using the correct
coagulant blend, varying molecular weights, charge densities, and dosages of flocculent until the correct combination of chemistry, dosing, and operations were discovered. The sludge cake produced with this program can be dewatered to local standards and properly disposed of in landfills.

After initial success, the program was rolled out to other facilities, and is now in place in over 40 industrial laundries treating between 2 and 3 million gallons of wastewater per day to compliant standards and reuse quality. During the past three years over thirteen awards for compliance excellence have been awarded to facilities using GenChemUSA's Sludge Reduction Program. They range from silver and gold awards to industrial plant of the year.

The typical reduction in sludge generation at an industrial laundry transitioning from a traditional wastewater treatment program to "GenChemUSA's Sludge Reduction Program" ranges from 30% to 80%. This correlates to an estimated 11 million pounds of sludge per year not being sent to landfills, thus relieving an already stressed landfill system. Extrapolating these numbers to the costs to process (labor to dewater and process the sludge), and the costs to haul and dispose of the sludge, one can begin to see a plant's advantage in using GenChemUSA's Sludge Reduction Program.

The average savings for chemistry, labor, and sludge removal is estimated at over $20,000.00 per plant. Table A contains the cost data for 6 facilities that have converted to the patented sludge reduction treatment program. The table indicates savings in
chemistry, sludge, and labor.

The true measure of the program's success is creating compliant effluent. Table B is the data from a facility that had serious issues with compliance prior at the introduction of the program. After its introduction the plant achieved not only compliance with absolute
limits, but a great reduction in surchargable limits as well.

Presented in Table C are the results of Total Contained Leaching Process (TCLP) data used for determining the long-term hazardous effects of dewatered sludge. The TCLP approximates under laboratory conditions what the sludge will discharge during
decomposition into the surrounding environment as known hazardous components. Table C is the qualitative analysis of those hazardous components taken from sludge cake utilizing a prior method including bentonite clay (year 2002) and those utilizing the
method in accordance with this program (year 2003 in table C). It can be extrapolated from the above two sets of data that neither TCLP has components in sufficient quantities as to categorize the sludge as hazardous under most current regulations for the disposal of sludge.

Case Studies


Three case studies are presented to support the achievement of this program:

Case One

An industrial laundry with a typical product mix and with an average water flow of 70,000 gallons per day needed to inject as much as 600 pounds of bentonite clay slurry into the waste stream as a coagulant aid and as a body feed for sludge dewatering. The
plant was producing 1,100 gallons of sludge per day and was not compliant. The treatment scheme utilized prior to GenChemUSA was an epi-amine/DADMAC (400-600 ppm) blended coagulant followed by bentonite clay injection (600-1200 ppm) followed by sodium acrylate flocculent (7-10 ppm). After transition to GenChemUSA's Sludge
Reduction Program, the plant became compliant (21 out of 21 on a standard Triton turbidity wedge) and sludge volume was reduced to 300-350 gallons per day with 25 cubic feet of sludge being produced after plate and frame dewatering.

Case Two

An industrial laundry with a wash mix that is a majority of heavy soil products and with an average water flow of 120,000 gallons per day treated their wastewater with separately fed injections of pDADMAC (200-500 part per million, ppm) followed approximately 20
seconds later by a second injection of polyaluminum chloride (400-800ppm) followed approximately 10 seconds later by an injection of sodium acrylate flocculent. In addition the plant was adding 350 pounds of diatomaceous earth as a sludge body feed. The plant
was producing 2200 gallons of sludge per day and was not compliant. After elimination of the previous treatment program and introduction of GenChemUSA's Sludge Reduction Program, the plant became compliant (21 out of 21 on a standard Triton turbidity wedge) and the amount of sludge produced was reduced to approximately 600 gallons per day. The body feed of perlite needed to produce sludge cake, was eliminated. Effluent testing done by a local laboratory showed total petroleum hydrocarbons to be 4 mg/l, which was well within regulatory limits.

Case Three

An industrial laundry with an average water flow of 80,000 gallons per day treated the wastewater with a pDADMAC coagulant blended with aluminum sulfate (Alum) (200- 400 ppm) injected prior to the transfer pump, followed by a bentonite clay injection (600-900 ppm) followed by an emulsion flocculent (7 ppm) 15 seconds down stream. The effluent was non-compliant, with a reading of four on a standard turbidity wedge. Sludge production for the facility was 560 gallons per day. Filter cakes were not forming inside the press, which necessitated hauling away liquid sludge. After replacement of the above-described and introduction of GenChemUSA's Sludge Reduction Program, the sludge was reduced to 325 gallons per day. The plant became compliant (with 21 out of 21 on a standard Triton turbidity wedge) and the cakes were well formed.

Summary


The Davis' and GenChemUSA believe that in developing this program we have achieved one of the most elusive goals of the EPA, true waste minimization. The extra benefit of lowering the operational and chemical costs of wastewater treatment is an additional
benefit to the plant. The sludge reduction from this program is real and occurs every working day. On the surface to the laundry professional the cost savings obtained by lowered sludge generation and less chemical costs is an immediate benefit to the individual and collective business units, however along with being revenue friendly it is environmentally proactive. The program provides savings in natural resources, reductions of waste, and relieves stress of precious landfill space. In short, it provides environmental stewardship of the planet.



 

Copyright 2007 © GenChemUSA, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Web site designed and maintained by
Simple Web Solutions.
GenChemUSA, LLC. / P.O. Box 15971 / Fernandina Beach, FL 32035
Phone: (904) 277-8919 / Fax: (904) 491-0887
Email: Click Here!

< Back Next >